
By Gurdeep Hundal
Just a quick one on the remarks by Barnet council who yesterday stated that Sikh students should not be allowed to carry their Kirpans – ceremonial daggers – in public places.
Unsurprisingly, the story has led to lots of chatter on the World Wide Web. However, what comes first, child protection or religious freedom?
Those schools which have banned Sikh children from wearing the Kirpan, a five inch knife regarded as one of Sikhism’s five articles of faith, must be worn at all times – are guilty of discrimination.
The obvious objection is that children are less able to control their anger, and in an environment where violence is prevalent amongst school kids and young adults – it is better to not carrying sharp blades.
So I should say, I am Sikh and I live in the United Kingdom where 600,000 resident are Punjabi, and I’m delighted to be apart of this community – but the issue of Sikh Kirpans is becoming a common trait.
I believe in religious freedom, but I don’t agree with banning burqas, Crosses, Kirpans or turbans. They are symbols of strength and courage which pose no physical danger to anyone.
I agree that banning weapons from schools is sensible, but these ornamental daggers are more religious ornaments than anything, and they are never used for offensive purposes.
What I don’t understand is why Compton School in Barnet decided to make an issue of something which rarely troubles pupils in the United Kingdom. Only one per cent of Sikhs carry the Kirpan in this country.
In the latter, the 14-year-old boy was asked to wear a two-inch version of the dagger but his parents rejected the proposal, as the miniature Kirpan was a replica and not a genuine. Mocking their religious beliefs.
So how can we meet halfway, and Sikhs be allowed to maintain religious identity? Easy, stop making a fuss about their Kirpans and get on with running this country. We’re in a recession. Lets sort that out first!





